They do not necessarily correspond to my personal point of view. The others, I do not have and my comments come from research on the internet, books, magazines and Mamiya documentation. In the following sections, all the lenses titles appended with an asterisk – * -are lenses that I have and that I can talk about, as well as show you the results I get with them. Non-W lenses are not common on the second-hand market, but you can see them in the Mamiya documentation for the first model. Mamiya did not manufacture them for very long and quickly moved on to the W versions.
#Mamiya rz67 floating system lens pro
Non-W lenses are quite the same lenses optically as the W versions, which is why I don’t present too much detail about them (except for the four I have).Īt the beginning of the production of the RZ Pro (I), non-W lenses were the only versions available.
#Mamiya rz67 floating system lens full
So, if you are used to shooting with zooms, you may have to change your point of view a little, along with your usage.įor my part, I do not take all of my lenses every time with me when I travel. The one and only zoom, although interesting, is not practical for use outdoors, at least in my experience. If you want the best for your RZ, and your photography, choose them!Īll but one of the Mamiya RZ67 system lenses are “prime” lenses. I’m not saying that it’s not worth it to buy the best quality lenses, like the APO, ULD, all lenses that Mamiya-Sekor have treated with their newer multi-coating process. I did not make this choice, because I’d rather be able to buy more lenses and the quality of the ones I have is enough for me, anyway. So if you can afford to buy them, do not hesitate to choose them. Although this patented technology has been improved over time and of course, the evolved versions are better, even much better, there is no doubt. Mamiya manufactured lenses treated with their own proprietary multi-coating technology. I can assure you that this is not the case at all, Mamiya’s optics for the RZ are all absolutely incredible, even those which are not APO/ULD variants or utilise a floating lens system… So it seems that everyone interested in the system starts from the premise that the other lenses are of lesser quality and ultimately bad. You can find much criticism about RZ lenses on dedicated websites and discussion forums, which will tell you that only the high-quality lenses are worth the investment. Here’s how this article breaks down (prepare yourself for a very long list).
This is mainly because of the high prices of the premium options but despite this, I am not disappointed with the quality of the lenses I have. Also, my collection is comprised of Mamiya’s “normal” lenses, not the APO, ULD, or other ultra high-quality lenses that Mamiya made. A complete guide to the Mamiya RZ67, part three: lenses, filters and accessories - EMULSIVE Close Search for:Īs I mentioned previous, I don’t have all of the Mamiya lenses RZ67 lenses in my collection.
0 kommentar(er)
